Google English: NO.1 mini Pad 7-inch phone evaluation
And that score is controversial with, at post time, a Comment calling it fraudulent:
True when those of us who the user is an idiot ah, put forward a review article or ps with a bunch of pictures, run sub-look ridiculously false sd card read and write speed of 106m / s, the Walled plant really is to the Guards. The back of the game screen, 1080p playback screen is a machine pictures ps numerous interface picture, if you run points is a screenshot of this cargo must be modified system ripoff.
Boldfaced emphasis added by me.
So why am I running this?
I’m running it to give the site the benefit of the doubt.
AnTuTu is not a secret test available only to a few. If the above results are fraudulent, others who run AnTuTu on that device will quickly point it out, destroying the credibility of that site. Just one YouTube video with a vastly different result can do it. It’s just not possible to hide fraud like that.
It could also be that the Commenter has a defective unit that doesn’t give that AnTuTu score, thus causing him to fling those accusations.
What I find interesting — taking the point of view that the test is genuine — is that’s the kind of score I was hoping for from both the Ramos X10 and the Onda V818. No such luck, though.
Onda V818 Gets Full AnTuTu Test
Onda V818 In Third Store Video
Guide To Chinese iPad Mini Clones
First iPad Mini Clone Hits Market: Ramos X10
iPad Mini Clone Onda V818 Mini Gets Firmware Update
Video: iPad Mini Clone Ramos X10
Video: iPad Mini Clone Onda V818
Onda V818 Gets Merciful Chinese Review
WiFi Direct And Miracast
AnTuTu Scores For Three CPUs
Video: iPad Mini Clone Ramos X10 Benchmarks