Google English: NO.1 mini Pad 7-inch phone evaluation
And that score is controversial with, at post time, a Comment calling it fraudulent:
True when those of us who the user is an idiot ah, put forward a review article or ps with a bunch of pictures, run sub-look ridiculously false sd card read and write speed of 106m / s, the Walled plant really is to the Guards. The back of the game screen, 1080p playback screen is a machine pictures ps numerous interface picture, if you run points is a screenshot of this cargo must be modified system ripoff.
Boldfaced emphasis added by me.
So why am I running this?
I’m running it to give the site the benefit of the doubt.
AnTuTu is not a secret test available only to a few. If the above results are fraudulent, others who run AnTuTu on that device will quickly point it out, destroying the credibility of that site. Just one YouTube video with a vastly different result can do it. It’s just not possible to hide fraud like that.
It could also be that the Commenter has a defective unit that doesn’t give that AnTuTu score, thus causing him to fling those accusations.
What I find interesting — taking the point of view that the test is genuine — is that’s the kind of score I was hoping for from both the Ramos X10 and the Onda V818. No such luck, though.
Previously here:
Onda V818 Gets Full AnTuTu Test
Onda V818 In Third Store Video
Guide To Chinese iPad Mini Clones
First iPad Mini Clone Hits Market: Ramos X10
iPad Mini Clone Onda V818 Mini Gets Firmware Update
Video: iPad Mini Clone Ramos X10
Video: iPad Mini Clone Onda V818
Onda V818 Gets Merciful Chinese Review
WiFi Direct And Miracast
AnTuTu Scores For Three CPUs
Video: iPad Mini Clone Ramos X10 Benchmarks
Mike Cane’s xBlog 