The Circle Jerk Of Typing Monkeys

Writer’s Cafe Kboards, Unethical Marketing Practices and Authors Behaving Badly, Part 1

If you are a bad writer — and most of these people are — then, the only way you can get anyone to read your work is through aggressive self-promotion.

Writer’s Cafe Kboards, Unethical Marketing Practices and Authors Behaving Badly, Part 2

And there are other names that come up, again and again, with similar tales of making it to the top simply by “word of mouth,” or entirely on their work’s own merit, for example, but when you do a little tiny bit of investigation you find this is the furthest thing from the truth.

Writer’s Cafe Kboards, Unethical Marketing Practices and Authors Behaving Badly, Part 3

Although all this fraud can hit an author directly in the bank account, it isn’t very good for readers, either. Fake reviews are lies and because of the way the system works it’s usually the books loaded down with the fraudulent 5-stars that rise to the top. This makes it more difficult for readers to connect with the reading material they really want. It, also, leads to a lot of disappointment for readers, which you will see expressed in the 1-star reviews at these same books – that is the ones that the readers were not intimidated (threatened with a lawsuit or harassed by the author) into removing.

Rant on Writer’s Cafe Kboards, Unethical Marketing Practices and Authors Behaving Badly, Part 4: Some Conclusions

You’ll see them – the usual suspects, I like to call them – sticking together anyplace this subject is being discussed, trying to influence the natural outrage that thinking, intelligent, basically moral people – both readers and writers of books – feel when they find out about it.

I didn’t click through to the links in each post to examine the minutiae. I can guess who most of the guilty are just from their behavior and bleatings outside of the Kindle Boards. I’ve mentioned at least two of them in my blogs.

Fraud can continue only for so long. The craven suck-ups who abet the fraud have only so much stamina — and only so much gullibility. Like every edifice that thinks itself untouchable and unassailable, it will all collapse in time.

My single word of advice to honest writers is this: If one of the fraudulent bastards gives you a blurb for your book, don’t use it. Using it will give them more credibility — and taint you in the eyes of honest writers.

Among illiterates money is regarded as the measuring rod for all things: for friendship, goodness, education, power, love.

Auto-da-Fé – Elias Canetti



Filed under Fraud, Writers, Writing

2 responses to “The Circle Jerk Of Typing Monkeys

  1. I wish amazon would step in more to enforce their stated no author reviews policy or that the FTC would jump in to remind that anything received for your review (including an exchange review) must be disclosed.

    So far, I only see amazon jumping in to clear off the 1 and 2 star reviews (I.e., only acting when not book promotional material). And, realistically, no, I don’t expect or want the FTC to make book reviews a priority over COPPA violations or product claims/reviews that cause physical (vs. financial) damage to misled consumers.

    It’s just a nasty business. I am clinging very tightly to reviewers I have followed for years, reviews from real life friends, and pretty much ignoring all other reviews (and with that, unfortunately, most of the self or indie published books). And I picked on amazon because that site does have the most spa and the most gamed reviews (boy do I wish they’d get rid of up/down voting); plus, they have definitely made it clear on their Shelfari and goodreads sites that in an author versus reader dispute (even if author found to be at fault or even banned for their bad behavior) the non-promotional to book sales content will be deleted.

    • mikecane

      I hardly ever count on reviews on the Net. I rely on word of mouth from people I associate with (includes people on Twitter), recommendations from writers, and blurbs from writers whose work I like. All reviews on the Net — which especially includes “professional” reviews for tech products — are suspect, one way or another.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s