Barnes & Noble = Blockbuster?

In 1994, Blockbuster was worth $8.4 billion.

Today, sixteen years later, it is worth $24 million.

Seventeen years that company had to change it ways, to save itself.

And I recall the words of the Nook-avoiding Chairman of Barnes & Noble, Len Riggio, from 1998twelve years ago:

I want to transform this enterprise from what it is into something that is totally different. I mean, totally different.

Let’s see:

1) Still lots of physical stores, like Blockbuster? Check.

2) Still dealing in physical goods, like Blockbuster? Check.

3) Embroiled in a hostile takeover ploy, like Blockbuster? Check.

4) Headed by people who avoid digital, like Blockbuster? Check.

5) Valuation sinking, like Blockbuster? Check.

It’s Friday, Len Riggio. Do your company some good after helping to sink sales of your lifeboat product, the Nook, earlier this week.

Tender your resignation!

3 Comments

Filed under Barnes & Noble Nook, Digital Overthrow

3 responses to “Barnes & Noble = Blockbuster?

  1. Pingback: One Writer Asks: Barnes & Noble = Blockbuster? - mediabistro.com: GalleyCat

  2. Richard McDonough

    Wrong. Tje guy in charge is a techie guy and they are committed to electronic distribution. What are you smoking?
    The bookstore as bricks and mortar is not dead. Blockbuster did not go electronic BN did.

    • mikecane

      Did you read any other posts linked to? When the frikkin CHAIRMAN publicly states HE doesn’t use his company’s own damned product, why should anyone else? And said Chairman had MORE THAN TEN YEARS to change things and didn’t. As for the “tech guy” you fawn over — Nook v1.0 was the buggiest damned thing ever released and was embarrassing.

Leave a comment